And The Relative Specialty* of President Obama!
A. The General Theory: Attack what works!
B. The Theory of Special Relativity: Congress makes the laws!
The General Theory of Karl Rove: *Attack what works*. The Theory of Special Relativity of Obama. "Congress makes the laws, and he can't rein(or reign o'r) cats or dogs.* (partial translation: laws are a product of committee think) It is not surprising that it is difficulty reading and two courts can read it different.
...
And congress can Bane or...
---
Focus/Highlight: 2nd Video w/ Chris Hayes
BTW: don't count on my physics but who knows?
*[Rough draft in progress.]
Q ED
6th edgy?
7-30-14
PARDON MY SPACIOUSNESS: WINDOWS/EXPLORER COMPATABILITY ANOMALY
Maslow's[?] woah.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Rove theory. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Rove theory. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Sunday, September 01, 2013
9-18-13 FP$
C-Cap or Decap(4): A. Rock,
Paper, Scissor? , B. , C. CU
T-party , D. An
Inconvenient Platonics? , e. GOP
Plan to Hurt Economy.
9-27-13 game / theory : A.(1), B.(2) Conservative Foray (4A), B. Dancing and Company II , C. Wise Crack, D. Initialism , E. Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)** , F. Child's Play / / A. C3-PO? , B.(1), C. The Other Debates , D. Karl Rove vs. WA Hyperbole , E. Toll Keen, the Try-Logy? F. Toll Keen?
FC
(1) A,periodB.
(2) as opposed to D. B.
9-27-13 game / theory : A.(1), B.(2) Conservative Foray (4A), B. Dancing and Company II , C. Wise Crack, D. Initialism , E. Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)** , F. Child's Play / / A. C3-PO? , B.(1), C. The Other Debates , D. Karl Rove vs. WA Hyperbole , E. Toll Keen, the Try-Logy? F. Toll Keen?
FC
(1) A,periodB.
(2) as opposed to D. B.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Apples and Oranges?
National Hyperbole?
Herman Cain is trying to explain his 9-9-9 or Sim City tax code, while Perry(or Romney) is trying to make the point that people don't want another tax, without pointing out the regressive nature of it. It really is apples and oranges, both of which will impact the 99% more than the 1%.
(tough segue)
(all+politics.)
[Cherry Picking the L word?]
[Local? Laffer? the Curve? Liberal?]
[My original intent was to note the rhetoric* in the hyperbole link, and get to my compromise-D point via "apples and oranges". i.e. who am I to recommend a Republican candidate? But suggesting that it go all the way, to the convention. Which itself is un-conventional, but do I have the facts to back that up? However...after last nights debate and a Rovian theory I have been scrolling over in my mind, could it be? Romney/Perry 2012?** In my opinion the best thing for the country is a more moderate Republican that will still be too right, that would allow Obama to hold the 99'ers. But that is not the way Republicans work, and it is even difficult sometimes for democracy to work. It is fine to attack an opponents strengths in a game or a battle and that works in politics, but that is not what works in governing.]
[Lions, and Tigers and Bears(please excuse the Wizard of OWS* analogy) is an apples and oranges and cherry picking procedure. For Republicans it is Tea or Koch and Rove, for democracy it is apples and oranges and cherry pitting. Pitting is a good thing, with apologies to Martha Stewart, not to mention George Washington, with his supposed hatchet.]
* not to disassemble in either sense, it is a great not so calm-pendium. Note that I did say "tough segue". And CAUTION please note that I do not always review the complete links that I insert, in particular the code of Rachel Maddow. And I cannot be responsible for links expiring or changing.
** Note that a more "realistic" combo(pardon the pun) may be Romney/Cain. And no pardon for the quotation marks, but the ticket would be more debate worthy. [OK, I pun on the pardon, but not the debate, with CAUTION.]
Herman Cain is trying to explain his 9-9-9 or Sim City tax code, while Perry(or Romney) is trying to make the point that people don't want another tax, without pointing out the regressive nature of it. It really is apples and oranges, both of which will impact the 99% more than the 1%.
(tough segue)
(all+politics.)
[Cherry Picking the L word?]
[Local? Laffer? the Curve? Liberal?]
[My original intent was to note the rhetoric* in the hyperbole link, and get to my compromise-D point via "apples and oranges". i.e. who am I to recommend a Republican candidate? But suggesting that it go all the way, to the convention. Which itself is un-conventional, but do I have the facts to back that up? However...after last nights debate and a Rovian theory I have been scrolling over in my mind, could it be? Romney/Perry 2012?** In my opinion the best thing for the country is a more moderate Republican that will still be too right, that would allow Obama to hold the 99'ers. But that is not the way Republicans work, and it is even difficult sometimes for democracy to work. It is fine to attack an opponents strengths in a game or a battle and that works in politics, but that is not what works in governing.]
[Lions, and Tigers and Bears(please excuse the Wizard of OWS* analogy) is an apples and oranges and cherry picking procedure. For Republicans it is Tea or Koch and Rove, for democracy it is apples and oranges and cherry pitting. Pitting is a good thing, with apologies to Martha Stewart, not to mention George Washington, with his supposed hatchet.]
* not to disassemble in either sense, it is a great not so calm-pendium. Note that I did say "tough segue". And CAUTION please note that I do not always review the complete links that I insert, in particular the code of Rachel Maddow. And I cannot be responsible for links expiring or changing.
** Note that a more "realistic" combo(pardon the pun) may be Romney/Cain. And no pardon for the quotation marks, but the ticket would be more debate worthy. [OK, I pun on the pardon, but not the debate, with CAUTION.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)